They need to just say fuck it and bring ned back lol
Try guys
- Thread starter Peaches Creame
- Start date
RocDaBoat
Worshipped Member
- Joined
- Jun 13, 2021
- Posts
- 3,110
- Media
- 0
- Likes
- 22,658
- Points
- 558
- Location
- New Jersey
- Sexuality
- 90% Gay, 10% Straight
- Gender
- Male
After the way they threw him under the bus? Granted most of that was probably Eugene’s doing because he was “mad” on Ariel’s behalf. Lol
Eugene was borderline the face of the company, so keith and zach would have listened to him, also him being "mad" on ariels behalf is still funny to me.
How did you guys circle to Ned being the victim here? Yall are weird af lol
We're the real victims, we don't get to see his dom slut energy anymore
Need that dom slut now haha
they are already rebranding now that Eugene is leaving/left. They brought in new cast members, creating a subscription channel/service - expanding. Who knows if it will work but they are trying
RocDaBoat
Worshipped Member
- Joined
- Jun 13, 2021
- Posts
- 3,110
- Media
- 0
- Likes
- 22,658
- Points
- 558
- Location
- New Jersey
- Sexuality
- 90% Gay, 10% Straight
- Gender
- Male
I know about those lives, but tbh they next to disconnect from as much related Try Guys material as possible
BiType
Legendary Member
- Joined
- Oct 12, 2022
- Posts
- 396
- Media
- 4
- Likes
- 1,759
- Points
- 188
- Location
- Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, US
- Sexuality
- 50% Straight, 50% Gay
- Gender
- Male
To date: the woman he had the pseudo-affair with has publicly said that she did not feel a power dynamic came into play in any way, and that everything they did was 100% consensual. To date his wife has not said anything about whether or not what happened affected her negatively or even if they had some kind of arrangement. The entire thing was absolutely bonkers blown out of proportion in a ridiculous SJW "we have to protect our brand by going way over the top in how we react to this" way, and IMO when they kicked him out, they jumped the shark. I mean their freaking apology was literally so stupid SNL did an entire SKETCH about it.
It was self-important bullshit and it was the beginning of the end. I totally believe Eugene was the type who was like "NO GUYS. NO WE CAN'T JUST LET THIS GO. WE HAVE TO ADDRESS IT GUYS. THIS IS SERIOUS."
Now look at the end result. Half of the content on their new website is about smoking weed, and btw I signed up for the 3 day free trial to see how "uncensored" things are - they just mean curse words. Not even unblurred versions of past underwear videos.
So IMO, honestly Ned WAS kind of a victim of a climate that made the other guys think if they didn't treat it like some kind of Me Too situation it would damage their brand, and instead the opposite happened. Seriously they could have just, if they HAD to do something, had him post a video where he admitted to cheating on his wife, apologizing, promising to do better and then moving forward creatinv content because no one would have given a shit.
Sorry for the TLDR. I just miss the old content.
I felt my braincells kill themselves after reading all of that.To date: the woman he had the pseudo-affair with has publicly said that she did not feel a power dynamic came into play in any way, and that everything they did was 100% consensual. To date his wife has not said anything about whether or not what happened affected her negatively or even if they had some kind of arrangement. The entire thing was absolutely bonkers blown out of proportion in a ridiculous SJW "we have to protect our brand by going way over the top in how we react to this" way, and IMO when they kicked him out, they jumped the shark. I mean their freaking apology was literally so stupid SNL did an entire SKETCH about it.
It was self-important bullshit and it was the beginning of the end. I totally believe Eugene was the type who was like "NO GUYS. NO WE CAN'T JUST LET THIS GO. WE HAVE TO ADDRESS IT GUYS. THIS IS SERIOUS."
Now look at the end result. Half of the content on their new website is about smoking weed, and btw I signed up for the 3 day free trial to see how "uncensored" things are - they just mean curse words. Not even unblurred versions of past underwear videos.
So IMO, honestly Ned WAS kind of a victim of a climate that made the other guys think if they didn't treat it like some kind of Me Too situation it would damage their brand, and instead the opposite happened. Seriously they could have just, if they HAD to do something, had him post a video where he admitted to cheating on his wife, apologizing, promising to do better and then moving forward creatinv content because no one would have given a shit.
Sorry for the TLDR. I just miss the old content.
oddpurple
Superior Member
- Joined
- Sep 17, 2017
- Posts
- 975
- Media
- 0
- Likes
- 9,550
- Points
- 338
- Location
- Ontario, Canada
- Sexuality
- Non-Binary
- Gender
- Female
-The other woman might have felt its consensual but people in imbalanced power dynamics are blind all the time, it’s the same reason people who are groomed when younger don’t see any problem with it as adults
-Maybe Ariel never and will never comment because it was HUMILIATING to have a husband who went on and on about her….still cheat on her? Maybe she doesn’t want to live in public, maybe she doesn’t want to publicly play anything out because she also has very young children
-The other guys handled it 100% appropriately. If they didn’t oust Ned that left them vulnerable to a whole rainbow of lawsuits and legal troubles , some of you really don’t understand business/the law
-SNL did a sketch on it because a writer is friends/went to college with Ned and SNL will literally do anything topical if it’s a slow news week.
If you really want to write paragraphs because you want to suck Ned’s cock, why not just save some time and find a way to contact him directly? Good lord
-Maybe Ariel never and will never comment because it was HUMILIATING to have a husband who went on and on about her….still cheat on her? Maybe she doesn’t want to live in public, maybe she doesn’t want to publicly play anything out because she also has very young children
-The other guys handled it 100% appropriately. If they didn’t oust Ned that left them vulnerable to a whole rainbow of lawsuits and legal troubles , some of you really don’t understand business/the law
-SNL did a sketch on it because a writer is friends/went to college with Ned and SNL will literally do anything topical if it’s a slow news week.
If you really want to write paragraphs because you want to suck Ned’s cock, why not just save some time and find a way to contact him directly? Good lord
People on here equate their attraction to someone with them being a good person and it's sad and pathetic. That's why you'll see people on here white knighting for some of the worst people on the internet just because their little peepee gets stiff.
Yeah... IDC about Ned being a cheater or Eugene being overdramatic or any of that other shit. I'm just trying to see some nudes. Preferably of Keith. He was always my favorite lol
BiType
Legendary Member
- Joined
- Oct 12, 2022
- Posts
- 396
- Media
- 4
- Likes
- 1,759
- Points
- 188
- Location
- Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, US
- Sexuality
- 50% Straight, 50% Gay
- Gender
- Male
Yeah like I litearlly never said Ned was a "good person." I doubt ANY of them are "good people". I just don't agree they handled Ned's ousting even remotely appropriately, and everybody speculating about the powder dynamics between the woman he cheated with and him honestly just takes complete agency away from that woman. Like a woman says "I consented and did not feel influenced by a power dynamic" and people have the unmitigated gall to say "NO. You were taken advantage of and you just don't see it. The way you feel is wrong and bad and you need to have experienced this the way WE think applies." That's beyond fucked up.
But yeah, sure, I want to suck Ned's cock. I want to suck all of their cocks. If I had to pick one cock I'd pick Zack preferably while Keith's hole was being ripped apart by MY cock. Doesn't change any of what I had to say. Said what I said!
Her agency doesn't matter. It was a power play in the workplace. That, at minimum, was the problem
That and the whole normative narrative about his being "the wife guy" and not the "I fuck my subordinates in public and homewreck another's relationship" guy
That and the whole normative narrative about his being "the wife guy" and not the "I fuck my subordinates in public and homewreck another's relationship" guy
Carlos Santos
LPSG Legend
To date: the woman he had the pseudo-affair with has publicly said that she did not feel a power dynamic came into play in any way, and that everything they did was 100% consensual. To date his wife has not said anything about whether or not what happened affected her negatively or even if they had some kind of arrangement. The entire thing was absolutely bonkers blown out of proportion in a ridiculous SJW "we have to protect our brand by going way over the top in how we react to this" way, and IMO when they kicked him out, they jumped the shark. I mean their freaking apology was literally so stupid SNL did an entire SKETCH about it.
It was self-important bullshit and it was the beginning of the end. I totally believe Eugene was the type who was like "NO GUYS. NO WE CAN'T JUST LET THIS GO. WE HAVE TO ADDRESS IT GUYS. THIS IS SERIOUS."
Now look at the end result. Half of the content on their new website is about smoking weed, and btw I signed up for the 3 day free trial to see how "uncensored" things are - they just mean curse words. Not even unblurred versions of past underwear videos.
So IMO, honestly Ned WAS kind of a victim of a climate that made the other guys think if they didn't treat it like some kind of Me Too situation it would damage their brand, and instead the opposite happened. Seriously they could have just, if they HAD to do something, had him post a video where he admitted to cheating on his wife, apologizing, promising to do better and then moving forward creatinv content because no one would have given a shit.
Sorry for the TLDR. I just miss the old content.
oddpurple
Superior Member
- Joined
- Sep 17, 2017
- Posts
- 975
- Media
- 0
- Likes
- 9,550
- Points
- 338
- Location
- Ontario, Canada
- Sexuality
- Non-Binary
- Gender
- Female
When you get a law degree or anything else remotely applicable like in Human Resources, public relations, etc and know a thing or several about business practices/codes of conduct/laws/etc
Then maybe your opinion about things being “handled appropriately” will actually mean something lmao
Then maybe your opinion about things being “handled appropriately” will actually mean something lmao
PeachyDistance
Superior Member
- Joined
- May 9, 2020
- Posts
- 2,488
- Media
- 0
- Likes
- 9,907
- Points
- 208
- Location
- Columbus (Ohio, United States)
- Sexuality
- 100% Gay, 0% Straight
- Gender
- Male
Yeah I’m just gonna call it as I see it… The Try Guys are over. Keith and Zach need to rebrand or just market themselves. They need to refresh their content and bring a different approach.
However what I fear is that their personalities on the internet were birthed from their association with the four try guys. Keith as the funny guy, Ned as the married one, Eugene as the moody high end one and Zach as the quirky nerd.
Their dynamics complimented one another and to be honest with you once any one of them left, the power dynamics shifting ruined it all. Now two are gone and they had a true personality punch. I just don’t think that Keith and Zach’s dynamics can hold it all together. They’ve eliminated the more risqué content and censored themselves heavily. The things that made them relatable are now gone.
However what I fear is that their personalities on the internet were birthed from their association with the four try guys. Keith as the funny guy, Ned as the married one, Eugene as the moody high end one and Zach as the quirky nerd.
Their dynamics complimented one another and to be honest with you once any one of them left, the power dynamics shifting ruined it all. Now two are gone and they had a true personality punch. I just don’t think that Keith and Zach’s dynamics can hold it all together. They’ve eliminated the more risqué content and censored themselves heavily. The things that made them relatable are now gone.
BiType
Legendary Member
- Joined
- Oct 12, 2022
- Posts
- 396
- Media
- 4
- Likes
- 1,759
- Points
- 188
- Location
- Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, US
- Sexuality
- 50% Straight, 50% Gay
- Gender
- Male
This is the most anti-woman pro-rape statement I have ever read in my life. "Her agency doesn't matter." Do you hear yourself? Jesus fucking christ.
Power imbalance *CAN* compromise the validity of consent. That does not mean that they *ALWAYS* compromise the validity of consent. For all of ya'll to be up in here absolutely removing this woman's ability to decide for herself whether that was the case is some of the most disgusting behavior I've ever seen in my entire life. You are literally insisting on writing HER narrative of the situation.
Here. Maybe this little pamphlet from The National Sexual Violence Resource Center will help you get a quick education.
https://www.nsvrc.org/sites/default/files/publications/2019-01/Power Dynamics Handout_508.pdf
This is SO fucking basic. SHE was there. YOU were not. SHE says she consented and did not feel pressured to consent based on any kind of power imblanace based on his position above her. YOU are here insisting SHE is wrong about HER experience. That makes YOU disgusting.
