Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hume's Fork (novel)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 06:37, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Hume's Fork (novel) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
WP:BOOKCRIT GraziePrego (talk) 05:20, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Literature and South Carolina. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 08:47, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
Comment, leaningKeep. From the Ebscosearch, there's a review in Booklist (Pitt, David. Booklist. 3/15/2007, Vol. 103 Issue 14, p23.). I suspect there will be others, as a review of its sequel in NYT says "Cooper's previous novel, "Hume's Fork," drew critical comparisons to "A Confederacy of Dunces"" (Martin, Cameron. Purple Jesus. New York Times Book Review (Dec 12, 2010): BR.24). Espresso Addict (talk) 04:45, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
- Switching to keep, per review found by A. B. below. Espresso Addict (talk) 06:47, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: The Philosophers' Magazine review: [1]
- Keep - notable. 2 reviews plus passing mentions (including the philosophy world - Connor is a philosophy professor and this book is a satire based on David Hume's "Hume's fork")
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.